Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFYX vs RGEBX
CGFYX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGFYX vs RGEBX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 3
Price$82.26
Change-$1.20 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.39B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.85
Change-$0.83 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
CGFYX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFYX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFYX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. CGFYX (6.39B). CGFYX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . CGFYX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CGFYX (17 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CGFYX (0.65). CGFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFYX: RGEBX (250) vs CGFYX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. CGFYX (8.12). CGFYX return over 5 years is better than : 49.40 vs. RGEBX (16.94).
| CGFYX | RGEBX | CGFYX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.08 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.08 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.772 | 1.552 | -50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.39B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.12 | 8.68 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.32 | 53.46 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.40 | 16.94 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.84 | 111.87 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers