Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFYX vs RGEBX
CGFYX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGFYX vs RGEBX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 3
Price$82.48
Change-$1.48 (-1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.55B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.68
Change-$1.32 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CGFYX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFYX vs. RGEBX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFYX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. CGFYX (6.55B). CGFYX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . CGFYX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CGFYX (16 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CGFYX (0.65). CGFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFYX: RGEBX (250) vs CGFYX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.04 vs. CGFYX (4.31). CGFYX return over 5 years is better than : 57.14 vs. RGEBX (30.20).
| CGFYX | RGEBX | CGFYX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.08 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.08 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.588 | 20.381 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.55B | 339B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.31 | 6.04 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.21 | 66.16 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.14 | 30.20 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.33 | 95.23 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement