Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFYX vs RGACX
CGFYX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CGFYX vs RGACX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 3
Price$85.72
Change+$0.73 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.35B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
CGFYX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFYX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFYX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CGFYX (6.35B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CGFYX: RGACX (0.07) vs CGFYX (0.00). CGFYX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CGFYX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CGFYX (0.66). CGFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFYX: RGACX (250) vs CGFYX (1000000). RGACX (17.83) and CGFYX (17.55) have marching annual gain over last year. CGFYX return over 5 years is better than : 53.02 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| CGFYX | RGACX | CGFYX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.864 | 15.516 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.35B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.55 | 17.83 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.97 | 58.53 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.02 | 40.02 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.74 | 95.93 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement