Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFYX vs GFFFX
CGFYX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts CGFYX vs GFFFX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst3
Price$85.03
Change-$0.14 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.34B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.87
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
CGFYX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFYX vs. GFFFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFYX is a Buy and GFFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. CGFYX (6.34B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than CGFYX: GFFFX (0.52) vs CGFYX (0.00). CGFYX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: CGFYX (16 years) vs GFFFX (17 years). CGFYX (0.66) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). CGFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFYX: GFFFX (250) vs CGFYX (1000000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. CGFYX (13.95). CGFYX return over 5 years is better than : 54.15 vs. GFFFX (45.50).
| CGFYX | GFFFX | CGFYX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.40 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.40 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.972 | 14.426 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.34B | 329B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.95 | 14.95 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.74 | 43.37 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.15 | 45.50 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.33 | 88.99 | 139% |