Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFYX vs GFFFX
CGFYX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts CGFYX vs GFFFX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 3
Price$85.72
Change+$0.73 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.35B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
CGFYX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFYX vs. GFFFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFYX is a Buy and GFFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CGFYX (6.35B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than CGFYX: GFFFX (0.51) vs CGFYX (0.00). CGFYX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: CGFYX (16 years) vs GFFFX (17 years). CGFYX (0.66) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). CGFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFYX: GFFFX (250) vs CGFYX (1000000). GFFFX (18.45) and CGFYX (17.55) have marching annual gain over last year. CGFYX return over 5 years is better than : 53.02 vs. GFFFX (43.16).
| CGFYX | GFFFX | CGFYX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.40 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.40 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.864 | 15.667 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.35B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.55 | 18.45 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.97 | 60.59 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.02 | 43.16 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.74 | 101.14 | 136% |