Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs ZVNIX
CGFAX vs ZVNIX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs ZVNIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$86.28
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
Price$44.34
Change+$0.21 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.95M
CGFAX vs ZVNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. ZVNIX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and ZVNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. ZVNIX (136M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than ZVNIX: CGFAX (0.31) vs ZVNIX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than ZVNIX: CGFAX (24 years) vs ZVNIX (10 years). ZVNIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNIX (15.24). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNIX: CGFAX (250) vs ZVNIX (50000). ZVNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.10 vs. CGFAX (11.47). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.47 vs. ZVNIX (15.80).
| CGFAX | ZVNIX | CGFAX / ZVNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.22 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.933 | 14.190 | 126% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 136M | 247,794% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 24.10 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.49 | 127.04 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.47 | 15.80 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.22 | 354.77 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers