Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs ZVNBX
CGFAX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$41.77
Change+$0.22 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.7M
CGFAX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. ZVNBX (144M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: CGFAX (0.32) vs ZVNBX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: CGFAX (24 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: CGFAX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.46 vs. CGFAX (14.57). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. ZVNBX (30.98).
| CGFAX | ZVNBX | CGFAX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.30 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.52 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | 10.415 | 137% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 144M | 228,472% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 27.46 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 71.40 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | 30.98 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers