Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs ZVNBX
CGFAX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$41.84
Change+$0.21 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.09M
CGFAX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ZVNBX (143M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: CGFAX (0.32) vs ZVNBX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: CGFAX (24 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: CGFAX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.83 vs. CGFAX (18.35). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. ZVNBX (27.29).
| CGFAX | ZVNBX | CGFAX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.30 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.52 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | 10.600 | 149% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 143M | 232,168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | 30.83 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 101.93 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | 27.29 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | 319.66 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers