Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPSZX
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$56.85
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets735.29M
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPSZX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WPSZX (735M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WPSZX (0.15). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPSZX (11 years). WPSZX (0.72) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: CGFAX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. WPSZX (-0.91). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. WPSZX (24.16).
| CGFAX | WPSZX | CGFAX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.72 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.72 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | 7.183 | 199% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 735M | 44,762% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.15 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -0.91 | -1,597% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 12.53 | 342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | 24.16 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | 93.47 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement