Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPSZX
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.65
Change-$1.91 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$56.44
Change-$0.95 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets717.72M
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPSZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WPSZX (718M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: CGFAX (0.30) vs WPSZX (0.15). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). WPSZX (0.72) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: CGFAX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. WPSZX (-6.85). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.46 vs. WPSZX (13.53).
| CGFAX | WPSZX | CGFAX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.72 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.72 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.072 | 8.201 | 208% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 718M | 47,354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.15 | 207% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | -6.85 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.48 | 23.29 | 273% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.46 | 13.53 | 277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.71 | 108.04 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement