Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPSZX
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$79.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$52.59
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets677.6M
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPSZX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and WPSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WPSZX (678M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: CGFAX (0.31) vs WPSZX (0.15). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). WPSZX (0.74) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: CGFAX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.70 vs. WPSZX (-3.26). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.59 vs. WPSZX (5.58).
| CGFAX | WPSZX | CGFAX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.73 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.74 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.062 | -0.962 | -942% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 678M | 50,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.15 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | -3.26 | -175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.05 | 18.77 | 347% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.59 | 5.58 | 405% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.79 | 91.39 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement