Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPSZX
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$82.88
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$57.80
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.53M
CGFAX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPSZX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WPSZX (756M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: CGFAX (0.33) vs WPSZX (0.15). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: CGFAX (23 years) vs WPSZX (11 years). WPSZX (0.72) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: CGFAX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.64 vs. WPSZX (3.52). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.25 vs. WPSZX (31.49).
| CGFAX | WPSZX | CGFAX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.72 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.72 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 8.974 | 148% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 756M | 43,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.15 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.64 | 3.52 | 501% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.64 | 27.39 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.25 | 31.49 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.72 | 99.13 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement