Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$49.12
Change+$0.46 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets725.27M
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPCSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPCSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WPCSX (725M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WPCSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: CGFAX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. WPCSX (-4.88). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. WPCSX (12.19).
| CGFAX | WPCSX | CGFAX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | 5.701 | 276% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 725M | 45,793% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | -4.88 | -376% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 18.20 | 332% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | 12.19 | 350% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | 76.14 | 138% |