Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.65
Change-$1.91 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$48.48
Change-$0.82 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets717.72M
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPCSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WPCSX (718M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: CGFAX (0.30) vs WPCSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: CGFAX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.78 vs. WPCSX (-9.12). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.52 vs. WPCSX (4.60).
| CGFAX | WPCSX | CGFAX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.683 | 7.267 | 271% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 718M | 47,354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.78 | -9.12 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.19 | 17.46 | 373% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.52 | 4.60 | 880% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.90 | 80.65 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers