Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$48.96
Change-$0.12 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets735.29M
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPCSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WPCSX (735M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WPCSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: CGFAX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. WPCSX (-3.32). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. WPCSX (14.39).
| CGFAX | WPCSX | CGFAX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | 6.527 | 219% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 735M | 44,762% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -3.32 | -439% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 7.20 | 594% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | 14.39 | 310% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | 67.96 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement