Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$81.32
Change+$0.79 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$48.90
Change+$0.53 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets751M
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. WPCSX (751M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: CGFAX (0.33) vs WPCSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: CGFAX (23 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: CGFAX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.74 vs. WPCSX (-2.18). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.82 vs. WPCSX (22.53).
| CGFAX | WPCSX | CGFAX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.154 | 6.397 | 174% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 751M | 43,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.74 | -2.18 | -492% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.86 | 21.76 | 275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.82 | 22.53 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.43 | 72.55 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement