Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.93
Change+$0.34 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$48.76
Change+$0.23 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets721.52M
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPCSX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. WPCSX (722M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WPCSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: CGFAX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. WPCSX (-8.14). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.40 vs. WPCSX (15.33).
| CGFAX | WPCSX | CGFAX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.455 | 6.092 | 287% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 722M | 46,676% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | -8.14 | -156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.23 | 28.42 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.40 | 15.33 | 316% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.27 | 87.39 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement