Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WPCSX
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$82.88
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$49.81
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.53M
CGFAX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WPCSX (756M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: CGFAX (0.33) vs WPCSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: CGFAX (23 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: CGFAX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.64 vs. WPCSX (1.01). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.25 vs. WPCSX (21.16).
| CGFAX | WPCSX | CGFAX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 8.377 | 159% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 756M | 43,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.64 | 1.01 | 1,739% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.64 | 21.37 | 274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.25 | 21.16 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.72 | 72.89 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement