Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WLGRX
CGFAX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$35.72
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.17B
CGFAX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WLGRX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WLGRX (8.17B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WLGRX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: WLGRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. WLGRX (11.59). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. WLGRX (34.24).
| CGFAX | WLGRX | CGFAX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.14 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.24 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | 7.299 | 195% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 8.17B | 4,026% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 11.59 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 30.13 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | 34.24 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | 85.75 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement