Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WBGSX
CGFAX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.93
Change+$0.34 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
William Blair Growth N
Price$9.72
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.42M
CGFAX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WBGSX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WBGSX (246M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WBGSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: CGFAX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. WBGSX (-15.03). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.40 vs. WBGSX (-11.23).
| CGFAX | WBGSX | CGFAX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.20 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.23 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.455 | 10.580 | 165% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 246M | 136,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | -15.03 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.23 | 20.60 | 356% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.40 | -11.23 | -431% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.27 | -25.74 | -471% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers