Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs WBGSX
CGFAX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
William Blair Growth N
Price$9.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.27M
CGFAX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. WBGSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and WBGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WBGSX (245M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: CGFAX (0.32) vs WBGSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: CGFAX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. WBGSX (-13.56). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. WBGSX (-14.10).
| CGFAX | WBGSX | CGFAX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.20 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.23 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | 8.077 | 177% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 245M | 134,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -13.56 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | -3.26 | -1,314% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | -14.10 | -317% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | -34.12 | -271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers