Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs URLGX
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs URLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.56
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth R
Price$3.81
Change+$0.01 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets678.89M
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. URLGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and URLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. URLGX (679M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than URLGX: CGFAX (0.30) vs URLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than URLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs URLGX (21 years). URLGX (1.41) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). URLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). URLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: URLGX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.78 vs. URLGX (-34.54). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.52 vs. URLGX (-71.61).
| CGFAX | URLGX | CGFAX / URLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.30 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.41 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.683 | -21.926 | -90% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 679M | 50,221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.78 | -34.54 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.19 | -23.49 | -277% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.52 | -71.61 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.90 | -77.10 | -140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement