Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs URLGX
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs URLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$77.34
Change-$0.75 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth R
Price$2.63
Change-$0.02 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets572.01M
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. URLGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and URLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. URLGX (572M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than URLGX: CGFAX (0.25) vs URLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than URLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs URLGX (21 years). URLGX (1.41) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). URLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). URLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: URLGX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. URLGX (-46.57). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.28 vs. URLGX (-78.15).
| CGFAX | URLGX | CGFAX / URLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.30 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.41 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.014 | -5.357 | 19% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 572M | 58,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | -46.57 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.42 | -50.56 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | -78.15 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.98 | -78.42 | -158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers