Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs URLGX
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs URLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.15
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth R
Price$3.56
Change+$0.03 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets666.98M
CGFAX vs URLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. URLGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and URLGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. URLGX (667M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than URLGX: CGFAX (0.32) vs URLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than URLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs URLGX (21 years). URLGX (1.44) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). URLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). URLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: URLGX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. URLGX (-30.51). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. URLGX (-71.42).
| CGFAX | URLGX | CGFAX / URLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.30 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.44 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | -27.664 | -57% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 667M | 49,775% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | -30.51 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | -27.66 | -218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | -71.42 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | -78.51 | -134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement