Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs UMLGX
CGFAX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$79.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$7.18
Change+$0.02 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets631.06M
CGFAX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. UMLGX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and UMLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. UMLGX (631M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than UMLGX: CGFAX (0.31) vs UMLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). UMLGX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: CGFAX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.85 vs. UMLGX (-20.13). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.57 vs. UMLGX (-51.75).
| CGFAX | UMLGX | CGFAX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.80 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.049 | -17.755 | -51% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 631M | 53,724% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | -20.13 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.26 | 2.13 | 3,105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.57 | -51.75 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.84 | -58.04 | -170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers