Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs UMLGX
CGFAX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$78.09
Change-$9.48 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$6.70
Change-$1.34 (-16.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets591.98M
CGFAX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. UMLGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and UMLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. UMLGX (592M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than UMLGX: CGFAX (0.25) vs UMLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). UMLGX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: CGFAX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. UMLGX (-24.46). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.28 vs. UMLGX (-56.12).
| CGFAX | UMLGX | CGFAX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.80 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.014 | -5.099 | 20% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 592M | 56,757% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | -24.46 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.42 | -16.15 | -275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | -56.12 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.98 | -49.05 | -253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers