Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIRX
CGFAX vs TRIRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$86.28
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.43B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx Retire
Price$78.84
Change+$0.39 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.07B
CGFAX vs TRIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIRX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and TRIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. TRIRX (18.1B). CGFAX (0.31) and TRIRX (0.31) have matching dividends . CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIRX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TRIRX (23 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than TRIRX (0.30). TRIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). TRIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: TRIRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). TRIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.50 vs. CGFAX (11.37). TRIRX return over 5 years is better than : 69.41 vs. CGFAX (40.19).
| CGFAX | TRIRX | CGFAX / TRIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.30 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.30 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.701 | 16.050 | 110% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 18.1B | 1,867% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.31 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.37 | 19.50 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.84 | 93.21 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.19 | 69.41 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.83 | 270.88 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement