Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIHX
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$78.09
Change-$9.48 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx I
Price$73.60
Change-$5.71 (-7.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.94B
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and TRIHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TRIHX (17.9B). TRIHX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: TRIHX (0.43) vs CGFAX (0.25). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TRIHX (10 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.16). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIHX (27.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: CGFAX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. CGFAX (2.57). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 47.14 vs. CGFAX (13.28).
| CGFAX | TRIHX | CGFAX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.16 | 388% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.16 | 388% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.014 | -2.954 | 34% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 17.9B | 1,877% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.43 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 9.58 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.42 | 81.62 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | 47.14 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.98 | 294.48 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers