Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs TRIHX
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TRIHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.09
Change-$1.36 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx I
Price$75.48
Change-$4.56 (-5.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.31B
CGFAX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TRIHX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and TRIHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. TRIHX (18.3B). TRIHX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: TRIHX (0.40) vs CGFAX (0.31). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: CGFAX (24 years) vs TRIHX (10 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.16). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIHX (27.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: CGFAX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.73 vs. CGFAX (6.72). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 71.94 vs. CGFAX (33.90).
| CGFAX | TRIHX | CGFAX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.16 | 388% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.16 | 388% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.899 | 19.749 | 106% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 18.3B | 1,852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.40 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | 15.73 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.05 | 106.82 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.90 | 71.94 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.44 | 290.93 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement