Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs SLGYX
CGFAX vs SLGYX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs SLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$81.32
Change+$0.79 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth A
Price$24.82
Change+$0.31 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.44M
CGFAX vs SLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. SLGYX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and SLGYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. SLGYX (39.4M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than SLGYX: CGFAX (0.33) vs SLGYX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than SLGYX: CGFAX (23 years) vs SLGYX (19 years). SLGYX (2.11) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). SLGYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). SLGYX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLGYX: CGFAX (250) vs SLGYX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.74 vs. SLGYX (-4.90). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.82 vs. SLGYX (9.39).
| CGFAX | SLGYX | CGFAX / SLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.11 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.11 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.154 | 9.920 | 112% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 39.4M | 819,797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.74 | -4.90 | -219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.86 | 34.89 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.82 | 9.39 | 531% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.43 | -5.49 | -1,666% |