Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs SLGCX
CGFAX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$86.33
Change+$0.40 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$6.14
Change+$0.04 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.24M
CGFAX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. SLGCX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. SLGCX (41.2M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: CGFAX (0.32) vs SLGCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: CGFAX (24 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.06 vs. SLGCX (-43.57). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.40 vs. SLGCX (-61.92).
| CGFAX | SLGCX | CGFAX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.67 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.67 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.455 | 18.447 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 41.2M | 817,961% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.06 | -43.57 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.15 | -32.67 | -230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.40 | -61.92 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.15 | -72.50 | -155% |