Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs SLGCX
CGFAX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.09
Change-$1.36 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$2.00
Change-$0.04 (-1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
CGFAX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. SLGCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and SLGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. SLGCX (41.6M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: CGFAX (0.31) vs SLGCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: CGFAX (24 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.72 vs. SLGCX (-62.01). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.90 vs. SLGCX (-85.80).
| CGFAX | SLGCX | CGFAX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.67 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.67 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.899 | -60.388 | -35% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 41.6M | 814,904% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | -62.01 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.05 | -74.81 | -92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.90 | -85.80 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.44 | -91.42 | -120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement