Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs SLCGX
CGFAX vs SLCGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs SLCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$77.70
Change+$0.85 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth I
Price$30.38
Change+$0.40 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.97M
CGFAX vs SLCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. SLCGX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and SLCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. SLCGX (37M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than SLCGX: CGFAX (0.35) vs SLCGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than SLCGX: CGFAX (23 years) vs SLCGX (31 years). SLCGX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). SLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX (250) and SLCGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. SLCGX (-1.96). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.54 vs. SLCGX (25.65).
| CGFAX | SLCGX | CGFAX / SLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.70 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.70 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.044 | 3.917 | 129% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 37M | 827,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | -1.96 | -365% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.61 | 42.69 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.54 | 25.65 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.77 | 7.86 | 990% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement