Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RMBGX
CGFAX vs RMBGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RMBGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$78.09
Change-$9.48 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
CGFAX vs RMBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RMBGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and RMBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RMBGX (115M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RMBGX: CGFAX (0.25) vs RMBGX (0.09). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RMBGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RMBGX (9 years). RMBGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RMBGX (10.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBGX: CGFAX (250) vs RMBGX (100000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. RMBGX (-1.33). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.28 vs. RMBGX (9.65).
| CGFAX | RMBGX | CGFAX / RMBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.99 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.99 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.014 | -1.911 | 53% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 115M | 292,174% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.09 | 290% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | -1.33 | -193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.42 | 17.94 | 248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | 9.65 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers