Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RBCGX
CGFAX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$76.98
Change-$0.12 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.8M
CGFAX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RBCGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. RBCGX (75.8M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: CGFAX (0.32) vs RBCGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: CGFAX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.89 vs. CGFAX (18.35). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. RBCGX (11.26).
| CGFAX | RBCGX | CGFAX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.01 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.01 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | 14.163 | 111% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 75.8M | 437,995% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | 22.89 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 62.13 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | 11.26 | 379% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | 31.82 | 331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement