Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RBCGX
CGFAX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$79.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$67.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.32M
CGFAX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RBCGX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RBCGX (73.3M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: CGFAX (0.31) vs RBCGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: CGFAX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.85 vs. RBCGX (-3.76). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.57 vs. RBCGX (-3.90).
| CGFAX | RBCGX | CGFAX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.01 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.01 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.049 | -0.252 | -3,589% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 73.3M | 462,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | -3.76 | -155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.26 | 59.84 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.57 | -3.90 | -579% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.84 | 18.54 | 533% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement