Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RAFBX
CGFAX vs RAFBX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RAFBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
American Funds AMCAP R2
Price$37.72
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.63B
CGFAX vs RAFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RAFBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and RAFBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. RAFBX (95.6B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RAFBX: CGFAX (0.32) vs RAFBX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RAFBX: CGFAX (24 years) vs RAFBX (23 years). RAFBX (1.42) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). RAFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX (250) and RAFBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. RAFBX (6.86). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. RAFBX (18.50).
| CGFAX | RAFBX | CGFAX / RAFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.42 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.42 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | 6.614 | 238% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 95.6B | 347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | 6.86 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 43.97 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | 18.50 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | 50.94 | 207% |