Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs RAFBX
CGFAX vs RAFBX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs RAFBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$82.88
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
American Funds AMCAP R2
Price$37.25
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.21B
CGFAX vs RAFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. RAFBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and RAFBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. RAFBX (95.2B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than RAFBX: CGFAX (0.33) vs RAFBX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than RAFBX: CGFAX (23 years) vs RAFBX (23 years). RAFBX (1.42) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). RAFBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX (250) and RAFBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.64 vs. RAFBX (6.92). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.25 vs. RAFBX (20.94).
| CGFAX | RAFBX | CGFAX / RAFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.42 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.42 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 5.285 | 251% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 95.2B | 345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.64 | 6.92 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.64 | 41.58 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.25 | 20.94 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.72 | 41.15 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement