Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs QILGX
CGFAX vs QILGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs QILGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth IS
Price$41.30
Change-$0.06 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.45B
CGFAX vs QILGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. QILGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and QILGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. QILGX (3.45B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than QILGX: CGFAX (0.32) vs QILGX (0.01). CGFAX was incepted earlier than QILGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs QILGX (20 years). QILGX (0.89) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). QILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QILGX: CGFAX (250) vs QILGX (1000000). QILGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.28 vs. CGFAX (14.57). QILGX return over 5 years is better than : 53.62 vs. CGFAX (44.65).
| CGFAX | QILGX | CGFAX / QILGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | 12.015 | 119% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 3.45B | 9,550% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.01 | 5,076% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 20.28 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 56.47 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | 53.62 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | 130.91 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement