Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs QCLGX
CGFAX vs QCLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs QCLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.93
Change+$0.34 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.45
Change+$0.10 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.9B
CGFAX vs QCLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. QCLGX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and QCLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. QCLGX (3.9B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: CGFAX (0.32) vs QCLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than QCLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs QCLGX (20 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: CGFAX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.74 vs. CGFAX (12.70). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.40 vs. QCLGX (31.65).
| CGFAX | QCLGX | CGFAX / QCLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.88 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.455 | 14.810 | 118% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 3.9B | 8,639% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | 15.74 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.23 | 73.69 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.40 | 31.65 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.27 | 95.53 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers