Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs QCLGX
CGFAX vs QCLGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs QCLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$82.77
Change-$1.02 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.64B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$27.20
Change-$0.38 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.41B
CGFAX vs QCLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. QCLGX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and QCLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. QCLGX (3.41B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: CGFAX (0.32) vs QCLGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than QCLGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs QCLGX (20 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: CGFAX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.29 vs. CGFAX (12.29). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.62 vs. QCLGX (21.65).
| CGFAX | QCLGX | CGFAX / QCLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.75 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.88 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.136 | 9.766 | 135% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 3.41B | 9,686% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.29 | 14.29 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.42 | 42.93 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.62 | 21.65 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.10 | 80.13 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement