Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PPUMX
CGFAX vs PPUMX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PPUMX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Principal LargeCap Growth I R3
Price$13.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.18B
CGFAX vs PPUMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PPUMX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and PPUMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. PPUMX (9.18B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PPUMX: CGFAX (0.32) vs PPUMX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PPUMX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PPUMX (25 years). PPUMX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). PPUMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.60 vs. CGFAX (25.00). PPUMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: PPUMX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. PPUMX (-17.23). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. PPUMX (-20.28).
| CGFAX | PPUMX | CGFAX / PPUMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.16 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.18 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | 9.558 | 149% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 9.18B | 3,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -17.23 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | -8.82 | -485% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | -20.28 | -220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | 6.31 | 1,465% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement