Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PBQAX
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PBQAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.93
Change+$0.34 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PBQAX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and PBQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PBQAX (1.08B). PBQAX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: PBQAX (0.43) vs CGFAX (0.32). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PBQAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PBQAX (36 years). PBQAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). PBQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). PBQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBQAX: CGFAX (250) vs PBQAX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. PBQAX (-0.66). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.81 vs. PBQAX (23.20).
| CGFAX | PBQAX | CGFAX / PBQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.990 | 8.313 | 204% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.08B | 30,996% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.43 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.26 | -0.66 | -1,864% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.54 | 50.53 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.81 | 23.20 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.39 | 37.03 | 325% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement