Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PBQAX
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PBQAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$86.28
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PBQAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and PBQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PBQAX (1.09B). PBQAX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: PBQAX (0.43) vs CGFAX (0.31). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PBQAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PBQAX (36 years). PBQAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). PBQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). PBQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBQAX: CGFAX (250) vs PBQAX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. PBQAX (-2.79). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.47 vs. PBQAX (14.08).
| CGFAX | PBQAX | CGFAX / PBQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.933 | 8.313 | 216% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 1.09B | 30,939% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.43 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | -2.79 | -412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.49 | 45.08 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.47 | 14.08 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.22 | 28.36 | 375% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement