Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PBQAX
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PBQAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.09
Change-$1.36 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CGFAX vs PBQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PBQAX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and PBQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PBQAX (1.02B). PBQAX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: PBQAX (0.41) vs CGFAX (0.31). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PBQAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PBQAX (36 years). PBQAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). PBQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). PBQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBQAX: CGFAX (250) vs PBQAX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.72 vs. PBQAX (-0.32). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.90 vs. PBQAX (8.58).
| CGFAX | PBQAX | CGFAX / PBQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.91 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.899 | 3.846 | 543% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 1.02B | 33,105% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.41 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | -0.32 | -2,115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.05 | 35.31 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.90 | 8.58 | 395% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.44 | 23.60 | 464% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement