Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs PAWAX
CGFAX vs PAWAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs PAWAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$78.09
Change-$9.48 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-Adv
Price$73.68
Change-$7.55 (-9.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.75B
CGFAX vs PAWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. PAWAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and PAWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PAWAX (16.7B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than PAWAX: CGFAX (0.25) vs PAWAX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than PAWAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs PAWAX (20 years). PAWAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). PAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.20 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAWAX: CGFAX (250) vs PAWAX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. PAWAX (1.52). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.28 vs. PAWAX (6.84).
| CGFAX | PAWAX | CGFAX / PAWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.05 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.05 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.014 | -1.629 | 62% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 16.7B | 2,012% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 1.52 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.42 | 37.49 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | 6.84 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.98 | 110.46 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers