Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs NVLIX
CGFAX vs NVLIX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs NVLIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$78.09
Change-$9.48 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG I
Price$53.46
Change-$15.90 (-22.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets825.35M
CGFAX vs NVLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. NVLIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and NVLIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NVLIX (825M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than NVLIX: CGFAX (0.25) vs NVLIX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than NVLIX: CGFAX (24 years) vs NVLIX (17 years). NVLIX (0.78) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). NVLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NVLIX: CGFAX (250) vs NVLIX (100000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. NVLIX (-12.99). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.28 vs. NVLIX (-3.12).
| CGFAX | NVLIX | CGFAX / NVLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.65 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.78 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.014 | -4.039 | 25% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 825M | 40,727% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | -12.99 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.42 | 23.66 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | -3.12 | -426% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.98 | 53.71 | 231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers