Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MLACX
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$76.85
Change-$0.93 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.49
Change-$0.05 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.45B
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MLACX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and MLACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. MLACX (13.5B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MLACX: CGFAX (0.35) vs MLACX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MLACX: CGFAX (23 years) vs MLACX (20 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: CGFAX (250) vs MLACX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. MLACX (-22.59). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.54 vs. MLACX (-39.49).
| CGFAX | MLACX | CGFAX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.88 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.89 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.044 | 4.662 | 108% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 13.5B | 2,267% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | -22.59 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.61 | -11.79 | -455% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.54 | -39.49 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.77 | -52.94 | -147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement