Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MLACX
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$79.79
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$2.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.46B
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MLACX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and MLACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MLACX (13.5B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MLACX: CGFAX (0.31) vs MLACX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MLACX: CGFAX (24 years) vs MLACX (21 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: CGFAX (250) vs MLACX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.70 vs. MLACX (-37.30). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.59 vs. MLACX (-68.11).
| CGFAX | MLACX | CGFAX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.88 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.89 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.062 | -34.965 | -26% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 13.5B | 2,511% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | -37.30 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.05 | -34.04 | -191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.59 | -68.11 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.79 | -66.71 | -151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement