Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MLACX
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$78.09
Change-$9.48 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$2.62
Change-$2.38 (-47.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.36B
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MLACX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and MLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MLACX (12.4B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MLACX: CGFAX (0.25) vs MLACX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MLACX: CGFAX (24 years) vs MLACX (21 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: CGFAX (250) vs MLACX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. MLACX (-40.45). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.28 vs. MLACX (-71.37).
| CGFAX | MLACX | CGFAX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.88 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.89 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.014 | -4.727 | 21% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 12.4B | 2,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | -40.45 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.42 | -43.17 | -103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | -71.37 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.98 | -63.15 | -196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers