Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MLACX
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$81.32
Change+$0.79 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.75
Change+$0.06 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.1B
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MLACX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and MLACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. MLACX (14.1B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MLACX: CGFAX (0.33) vs MLACX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MLACX: CGFAX (23 years) vs MLACX (20 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: CGFAX (250) vs MLACX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.74 vs. MLACX (-21.87). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.82 vs. MLACX (-40.10).
| CGFAX | MLACX | CGFAX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.88 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.89 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.154 | 10.723 | 104% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 14.1B | 2,291% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.74 | -21.87 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.86 | -9.18 | -652% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.82 | -40.10 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.43 | -50.05 | -183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement