Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MLACX
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.65
Change-$1.91 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.89
Change-$0.11 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.69B
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MLACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and MLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. MLACX (13.7B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MLACX: CGFAX (0.30) vs MLACX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MLACX: CGFAX (24 years) vs MLACX (21 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: CGFAX (250) vs MLACX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. MLACX (-22.96). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.46 vs. MLACX (-44.26).
| CGFAX | MLACX | CGFAX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.88 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.89 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.072 | 16.550 | 103% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 13.7B | 2,482% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | -22.96 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.48 | -9.91 | -641% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.46 | -44.26 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.71 | -46.75 | -215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement