Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MLACX
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$82.88
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.78
Change+$0.04 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.09B
CGFAX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MLACX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and MLACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. MLACX (14.1B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MLACX: CGFAX (0.33) vs MLACX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MLACX: CGFAX (23 years) vs MLACX (20 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: CGFAX (250) vs MLACX (1000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.64 vs. MLACX (-15.55). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.25 vs. MLACX (-40.47).
| CGFAX | MLACX | CGFAX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.88 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.89 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 11.422 | 116% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 14.1B | 2,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.64 | -15.55 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.64 | -10.99 | -534% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.25 | -40.47 | -122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.72 | -51.52 | -178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers