Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs MCGFX
CGFAX vs MCGFX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs MCGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$82.77
Change-$1.02 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.64B
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$13.80
Change-$0.11 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.71M
CGFAX vs MCGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. MCGFX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and MCGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. MCGFX (213M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than MCGFX: CGFAX (0.32) vs MCGFX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than MCGFX: CGFAX (24 years) vs MCGFX (31 years). MCGFX (0.97) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: CGFAX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. MCGFX (3.60). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.62 vs. MCGFX (-37.04).
| CGFAX | MCGFX | CGFAX / MCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.97 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.136 | 12.745 | 103% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 213M | 154,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.29 | 3.60 | 341% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.42 | 20.85 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.62 | -37.04 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.10 | -45.97 | -224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers