Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HCMSX
CGFAX vs HCMSX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HCMSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
CGFAX vs HCMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HCMSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and HCMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. HCMSX (1.9B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HCMSX: CGFAX (0.32) vs HCMSX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HCMSX: CGFAX (24 years) vs HCMSX (11 years). HCMSX (2.76) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). HCMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMSX: CGFAX (250) vs HCMSX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. HCMSX (10.30). HCMSX return over 5 years is better than : 71.84 vs. CGFAX (44.65).
| CGFAX | HCMSX | CGFAX / HCMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.25 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.76 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | 8.157 | 175% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 1.9B | 17,352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 10.30 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 42.44 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | 71.84 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | 228.78 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement