Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HCMGX
CGFAX vs HCMGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HCMGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$81.32
Change+$0.79 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
CGFAX vs HCMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HCMGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and HCMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. HCMGX (1.81B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HCMGX: CGFAX (0.33) vs HCMGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HCMGX: CGFAX (23 years) vs HCMGX (11 years). HCMGX (2.02) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). HCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). HCMGX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMGX: CGFAX (250) vs HCMGX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.74 vs. HCMGX (-2.78). HCMGX return over 5 years is better than : 82.44 vs. CGFAX (49.82).
| CGFAX | HCMGX | CGFAX / HCMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.02 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.02 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.154 | 2.250 | 496% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 1.81B | 17,865% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.74 | -2.78 | -387% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.86 | 49.63 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.82 | 82.44 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.43 | 212.63 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement