Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HCMGX
CGFAX vs HCMGX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HCMGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
CGFAX vs HCMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HCMGX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and HCMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. HCMGX (1.88B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HCMGX: CGFAX (0.32) vs HCMGX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HCMGX: CGFAX (24 years) vs HCMGX (11 years). HCMGX (2.02) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). HCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). HCMGX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMGX: CGFAX (250) vs HCMGX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. HCMGX (12.41). HCMGX return over 5 years is better than : 63.65 vs. CGFAX (42.66).
| CGFAX | HCMGX | CGFAX / HCMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.02 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.02 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | 7.656 | 206% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 1.88B | 17,650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | 12.41 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 59.42 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | 63.65 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | 263.08 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement