Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HCMDX
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HCMDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.88
Change+$0.53 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
HCM Tactical Plus Investor
Price$32.64
Change+$0.11 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HCMDX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and HCMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. HCMDX (2.07B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: CGFAX (0.31) vs HCMDX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HCMDX: CGFAX (24 years) vs HCMDX (11 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: CGFAX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. HCMDX (4.08). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 55.92 vs. CGFAX (32.29).
| CGFAX | HCMDX | CGFAX / HCMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.77 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.77 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.890 | 18.076 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 2.07B | 16,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 4.08 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.93 | 72.98 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.29 | 55.92 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.04 | 238.91 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement