Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HCMDX
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HCMDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$81.32
Change+$0.79 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
Price$27.95
Change+$0.42 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HCMDX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and HCMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. HCMDX (1.81B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: CGFAX (0.33) vs HCMDX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HCMDX: CGFAX (23 years) vs HCMDX (11 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: CGFAX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.74 vs. HCMDX (-4.28). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 73.93 vs. CGFAX (49.82).
| CGFAX | HCMDX | CGFAX / HCMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.77 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.77 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.154 | 1.859 | 600% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 1.81B | 17,865% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.74 | -4.28 | -251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.86 | 45.04 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.82 | 73.93 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.43 | 186.67 | 49% |