Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HCMDX
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HCMDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$83.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
HCM Tactical Plus Investor
Price$29.54
Change-$0.20 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HCMDX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and HCMDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. HCMDX (1.9B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: CGFAX (0.32) vs HCMDX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HCMDX: CGFAX (24 years) vs HCMDX (11 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: CGFAX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. HCMDX (8.60). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 63.84 vs. CGFAX (44.65).
| CGFAX | HCMDX | CGFAX / HCMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.77 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.77 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.270 | 7.653 | 186% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 1.9B | 17,352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 8.60 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 38.10 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.65 | 63.84 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.49 | 201.74 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement