Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HCMDX
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HCMDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$76.85
Change-$0.93 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
Price$25.67
Change-$0.50 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HCMDX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and HCMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. HCMDX (1.68B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: CGFAX (0.35) vs HCMDX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HCMDX: CGFAX (23 years) vs HCMDX (11 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: CGFAX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. HCMDX (-5.87). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 72.17 vs. CGFAX (49.54).
| CGFAX | HCMDX | CGFAX / HCMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.77 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.77 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.044 | -6.450 | -78% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 1.68B | 18,269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | -5.87 | -122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.61 | 34.19 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.54 | 72.17 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.77 | 158.51 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement