Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HCMDX
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HCMDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$79.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
HCM Tactical Plus Investor
Price$31.87
Change-$0.80 (-2.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HCMDX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and HCMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. HCMDX (2B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: CGFAX (0.31) vs HCMDX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HCMDX: CGFAX (24 years) vs HCMDX (11 years). HCMDX (2.73) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 264.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: CGFAX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). HCMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.18 vs. CGFAX (5.85). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 54.56 vs. CGFAX (22.57).
| CGFAX | HCMDX | CGFAX / HCMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.73 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.73 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.049 | 16.144 | 56% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 2B | 16,950% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | 9.18 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.26 | 83.16 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.57 | 54.56 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.84 | 239.04 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement