Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HCMDX
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HCMDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$78.09
Change-$9.48 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
HCM Tactical Plus Investor
Price$30.82
Change-$1.20 (-3.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HCMDX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and HCMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. HCMDX (2.03B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: CGFAX (0.25) vs HCMDX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HCMDX: CGFAX (24 years) vs HCMDX (12 years). HCMDX (2.73) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 264.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: CGFAX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). HCMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.05 vs. CGFAX (2.57). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 37.77 vs. CGFAX (13.28).
| CGFAX | HCMDX | CGFAX / HCMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.73 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.73 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.014 | -0.837 | 121% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 2.03B | 16,568% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 17.05 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.42 | 63.07 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | 37.77 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.98 | 288.65 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers