Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs HCMDX
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs HCMDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
HCM Tactical Plus Investor
Price$29.39
Change+$0.42 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
CGFAX vs HCMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. HCMDX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and HCMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. HCMDX (1.88B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: CGFAX (0.32) vs HCMDX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than HCMDX: CGFAX (24 years) vs HCMDX (11 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: CGFAX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. HCMDX (10.58). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 55.84 vs. CGFAX (42.66).
| CGFAX | HCMDX | CGFAX / HCMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.77 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 2.77 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | 6.997 | 225% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 1.88B | 17,669% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | 10.58 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 54.36 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | 55.84 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | 232.50 | 45% |