Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs GTLLX
CGFAX vs GTLLX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs GTLLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$81.32
Change+$0.79 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Glenmede Disciplined US Growth Eq Ptf
Price$29.03
Change+$0.35 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
CGFAX vs GTLLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. GTLLX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and GTLLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. GTLLX (1.27B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than GTLLX: CGFAX (0.33) vs GTLLX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than GTLLX: CGFAX (23 years) vs GTLLX (21 years). GTLLX (0.86) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). GTLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). GTLLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: GTLLX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.74 vs. GTLLX (-16.72). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.82 vs. GTLLX (-6.74).
| CGFAX | GTLLX | CGFAX / GTLLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.86 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.86 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.154 | 8.039 | 139% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 1.27B | 25,373% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.74 | -16.72 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.86 | 9.16 | 653% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.82 | -6.74 | -739% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.43 | 24.09 | 380% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement