Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FTRNX
CGFAX vs FTRNX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FTRNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$82.95
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
CGFAX vs FTRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FTRNX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and FTRNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FTRNX (4.12B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: FTRNX (0.55) vs CGFAX (0.33). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FTRNX: CGFAX (23 years) vs FTRNX (67 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FTRNX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.52 vs. FTRNX (10.52). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 54.49 vs. CGFAX (46.88).
| CGFAX | FTRNX | CGFAX / FTRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 67 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.382 | 8.493 | 158% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 4.12B | 7,969% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.55 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.52 | 10.52 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.29 | 53.01 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.88 | 54.49 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.41 | 119.39 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement