Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FTRNX
CGFAX vs FTRNX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FTRNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.65
Change-$1.91 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
CGFAX vs FTRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FTRNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and FTRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FTRNX (4.7B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: FTRNX (0.49) vs CGFAX (0.30). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FTRNX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FTRNX (67 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FTRNX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. FTRNX (1.08). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. CGFAX (37.46).
| CGFAX | FTRNX | CGFAX / FTRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 67 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.072 | 16.362 | 104% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 4.7B | 7,231% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.49 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | 1.08 | 609% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.48 | 78.17 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.46 | 45.63 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.71 | 143.37 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement