Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FTRNX
CGFAX vs FTRNX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FTRNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
CGFAX vs FTRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FTRNX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and FTRNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FTRNX (4.33B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than CGFAX: FTRNX (0.53) vs CGFAX (0.32). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FTRNX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FTRNX (67 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FTRNX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. FTRNX (14.20). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 45.70 vs. CGFAX (42.66).
| CGFAX | FTRNX | CGFAX / FTRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 67 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | 10.294 | 153% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 4.33B | 7,660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.53 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | 14.20 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 67.41 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | 45.70 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | 138.00 | 76% |