Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FGDKX
CGFAX vs FGDKX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FGDKX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.93
Change+$0.34 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
Fidelity Growth Discovery K
Price$68.81
Change+$0.17 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.43B
CGFAX vs FGDKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FGDKX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and FGDKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FGDKX (6.43B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than FGDKX: CGFAX (0.32) vs FGDKX (0.24). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FGDKX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FGDKX (17 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FGDKX (0.58). FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FGDKX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. FGDKX (10.14). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.40 vs. FGDKX (45.51).
| CGFAX | FGDKX | CGFAX / FGDKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.58 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.58 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.455 | 11.639 | 150% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 6.43B | 5,244% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.24 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | 10.14 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.23 | 73.17 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.40 | 45.51 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.27 | 204.34 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers