Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FDCAX
CGFAX vs FDCAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FDCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.09
Change-$1.36 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Fidelity Capital Appreciation
Price$45.89
Change-$4.48 (-8.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.21B
CGFAX vs FDCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FDCAX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a StrongBuy and FDCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. FDCAX (7.21B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than FDCAX: CGFAX (0.31) vs FDCAX (0.19). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FDCAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FDCAX (39 years). CGFAX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FDCAX (0.56). FDCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). FDCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FDCAX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.72 vs. FDCAX (-2.41). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.90 vs. FDCAX (25.27).
| CGFAX | FDCAX | CGFAX / FDCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.56 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.56 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.899 | 19.279 | 108% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.21B | 4,702% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.19 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | -2.41 | -279% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.05 | 52.95 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.90 | 25.27 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.44 | 61.20 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement