Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FCAKX
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FCAKX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$82.88
Change+$0.27 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Fidelity Capital Appreciation K
Price$46.30
Change+$0.14 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.81B
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FCAKX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and FCAKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FCAKX (6.81B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than FCAKX: CGFAX (0.33) vs FCAKX (0.21). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FCAKX: CGFAX (23 years) vs FCAKX (17 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FCAKX (0.49). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FCAKX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.64 vs. FCAKX (0.68). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.25 vs. FCAKX (25.56).
| CGFAX | FCAKX | CGFAX / FCAKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 9.198 | 144% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 6.81B | 4,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.21 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.64 | 0.68 | 2,607% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.64 | 30.45 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.25 | 25.56 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.72 | 22.58 | 406% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement