Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FCAKX
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FCAKX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$76.85
Change-$0.93 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Fidelity Capital Appreciation K
Price$43.47
Change-$0.62 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.55B
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FCAKX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and FCAKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. FCAKX (6.55B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than FCAKX: CGFAX (0.35) vs FCAKX (0.22). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FCAKX: CGFAX (23 years) vs FCAKX (17 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FCAKX (0.49). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FCAKX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. FCAKX (-7.46). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.54 vs. FCAKX (27.63).
| CGFAX | FCAKX | CGFAX / FCAKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.044 | 2.524 | 200% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 6.55B | 4,675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.22 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | -7.46 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.61 | 29.82 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.54 | 27.63 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.77 | 15.33 | 507% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers