Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs FCAKX
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs FCAKX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.15
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Fidelity Capital Appreciation K
Price$47.08
Change-$0.17 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.95B
CGFAX vs FCAKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. FCAKX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and FCAKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FCAKX (6.95B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than FCAKX: CGFAX (0.32) vs FCAKX (0.21). CGFAX was incepted earlier than FCAKX: CGFAX (24 years) vs FCAKX (17 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FCAKX (0.49). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: FCAKX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. FCAKX (0.63). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. FCAKX (19.33).
| CGFAX | FCAKX | CGFAX / FCAKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | 11.038 | 143% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 6.95B | 4,774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.21 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | 0.63 | 2,931% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | 33.13 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | 19.33 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | 31.39 | 336% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers