Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs ELGAX
CGFAX vs ELGAX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs ELGAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth A
Price$6.20
Change+$0.05 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets661.34M
CGFAX vs ELGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. ELGAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and ELGAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ELGAX (661M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than ELGAX: CGFAX (0.32) vs ELGAX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than ELGAX: CGFAX (24 years) vs ELGAX (18 years). ELGAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). ELGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). ELGAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ELGAX: CGFAX (250) vs ELGAX (2000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. ELGAX (-15.96). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.66 vs. ELGAX (-56.28).
| CGFAX | ELGAX | CGFAX / ELGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.05 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.19 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.760 | -16.190 | -97% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 661M | 50,227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | -15.96 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.35 | -4.20 | -1,437% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.66 | -56.28 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | -64.06 | -164% |