Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGFAX vs CGTRX
CGFAX vs CGTRX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs CGTRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$78.09
Change-$9.48 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst2
Price$8.19
Change-$1.44 (-14.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets576.82M
CGFAX vs CGTRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. CGTRX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and CGTRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. CGTRX (577M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than CGTRX: CGFAX (0.25) vs CGTRX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than CGTRX: CGFAX (24 years) vs CGTRX (13 years). CGTRX (0.83) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CGFAX (32.00). CGTRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: CGTRX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. CGTRX (-20.56). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.28 vs. CGTRX (-50.18).
| CGFAX | CGTRX | CGFAX / CGTRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.74 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.83 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.014 | -5.208 | 19% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 577M | 58,232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | -20.56 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.42 | -8.59 | -517% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | -50.18 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.98 | -39.24 | -316% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers