CGEM
Price
$7.09
Change
-$0.21 (-2.88%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
430.95M
87 days until earnings call
SILO
Price
$0.63
Change
-$0.06 (-8.70%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.52M
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGEM vs SILO

Header iconCGEM vs SILO Comparison
Open Charts CGEM vs SILOBanner chart's image
Cullinan Therapeutics
Price$7.09
Change-$0.21 (-2.88%)
Volume$15.04K
Capitalization430.95M
Silo Pharma
Price$0.63
Change-$0.06 (-8.70%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.52M
CGEM vs SILO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SILO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGEM vs. SILO commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGEM is a Hold and SILO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CGEM: $7.30 vs. SILO: $0.69)
Brand notoriety: CGEM and SILO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGEM: 165% vs. SILO: 37%
Market capitalization -- CGEM: $430.95M vs. SILO: $5.52M
CGEM [@Biotechnology] is valued at $430.95M. SILO’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $5.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $93.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $1.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSILO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SILO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGEM is a better buy in the long-term than SILO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SILO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SILO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SILO is a better buy in the short-term than CGEM.

Price Growth

CGEM (@Biotechnology) experienced а -4.89% price change this week, while SILO (@Biotechnology) price change was -4.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +22.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGEM is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

SILO is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+22.22% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGEM($431M) has a higher market cap than SILO($5.52M). SILO YTD gains are higher at: -22.112 vs. CGEM (-40.107). SILO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.61M vs. CGEM (-208.62M). CGEM has more cash in the bank: 304M vs. SILO (5.45M). SILO has less debt than CGEM: SILO (18.9K) vs CGEM (1.84M). SILO has higher revenues than CGEM: SILO (72.1K) vs CGEM (0).
CGEMSILOCGEM / SILO
Capitalization431M5.52M7,814%
EBITDA-208.62M-4.61M4,527%
Gain YTD-40.107-22.112181%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue072.1K-
Total Cash304M5.45M5,577%
Total Debt1.84M18.9K9,735%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SILO: Fundamental Ratings
SILO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGEMSILO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SILO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCSI23.842.87
+13.69%
Consensus Cloud Solutions
CBAT0.970.05
+5.38%
CBAK Energy Technology
ASGN50.20N/A
N/A
ASGN
BAH110.38-0.41
-0.37%
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp
JDZG1.70-0.19
-10.05%
Jiade Limited

CGEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGEM has been loosely correlated with IDYA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGEM jumps, then IDYA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGEM
1D Price
Change %
CGEM100%
+3.77%
IDYA - CGEM
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.08%
ATXS - CGEM
48%
Loosely correlated
-6.15%
DNLI - CGEM
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
BDTX - CGEM
47%
Loosely correlated
+5.26%
IMNM - CGEM
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More

SILO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILO has been loosely correlated with GNNSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SILO jumps, then GNNSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILO
1D Price
Change %
SILO100%
+10.15%
GNNSF - SILO
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SANA - SILO
33%
Poorly correlated
-29.41%
VIR - SILO
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
CGEM - SILO
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.77%
CTMX - SILO
25%
Poorly correlated
+11.90%
More