CGECF
Price
$42.00
Change
+$0.45 (+1.08%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
410.92M
CPROF
Price
$1.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
714.84K
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGECF vs CPROF

Header iconCGECF vs CPROF Comparison
Open Charts CGECF vs CPROFBanner chart's image
Coge
Price$42.00
Change+$0.45 (+1.08%)
Volume$145
Capitalization410.92M
Cortelco Systems Puerto Ri
Price$1.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.81K
Capitalization714.84K
CGECF vs CPROF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGECF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGECF vs. CPROF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGECF is a Hold and CPROF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CGECF: $42.00 vs. CPROF: $1.21)
Brand notoriety: CGECF and CPROF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGECF: 34% vs. CPROF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CGECF: $410.92M vs. CPROF: $714.84K
CGECF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $410.92M. CPROF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $714.84K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGECF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCPROF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGECF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CPROF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGECF is a better buy in the long-term than CPROF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGECF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CGECF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CGECF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -0.11% price change this week, while CPROF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.96% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGECF($411M) has a higher market cap than CPROF($715K). CGECF YTD gains are higher at: 5.316 vs. CPROF (0.000). CPROF has less debt than CGECF: CPROF (250K) vs CGECF (4.94B).
CGECFCPROFCGECF / CPROF
Capitalization411M715K57,483%
EBITDA1.43BN/A-
Gain YTD5.3160.000-
P/E Ratio6.33N/A-
Revenue3.05BN/A-
Total Cash241MN/A-
Total Debt4.94B250K1,975,200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGECF vs CPROF: Fundamental Ratings
CGECF
CPROF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5444
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPROF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as CGECF (14). This means that CPROF’s stock grew similarly to CGECF’s over the last 12 months.

CPROF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CGECF (100). This means that CPROF’s stock grew similarly to CGECF’s over the last 12 months.

CGECF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CPROF (100). This means that CGECF’s stock grew similarly to CPROF’s over the last 12 months.

CPROF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CGECF (62). This means that CPROF’s stock grew similarly to CGECF’s over the last 12 months.

CGECF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPROF (100). This means that CGECF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPROF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGECFCPROF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGECF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IARIX16.510.08
+0.49%
Invesco Real Estate R5
NRFNX11.290.03
+0.27%
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate N
SBPLX30.460.02
+0.07%
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy C
LAGWX23.56N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
BWLAX24.74-0.14
-0.56%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value A

CGECF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGECF and CGEAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGECF and CGEAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGECF
1D Price
Change %
CGECF100%
N/A
CGEAF - CGECF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - CGECF
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.32%
BTGOF - CGECF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
BZQIF - CGECF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPROF - CGECF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CPROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPROF has been loosely correlated with ATEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPROF jumps, then ATEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPROF
1D Price
Change %
CPROF100%
N/A
ATEX - CPROF
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.00%
IQST - CPROF
31%
Poorly correlated
-7.79%
BZQIF - CPROF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZQIY - CPROF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - CPROF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More