Advertisement
CGEAF vs CVHSY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGEAF is a Hold and CVHSY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGEAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCVHSY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CGEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CVHSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGEAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVHSY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CGEAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CVHSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CGEAF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -0.05% price change this week, while CVHSY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -10.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.57%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+0.51% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CGEAF | CVHSY | CGEAF / CVHSY | |
| Capitalization | 2.07B | 928M | 223% |
| EBITDA | 1.42B | 1.03T | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 1.184 | -15.094 | -8% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.91 | 163.52 | 5% |
| Revenue | 2.95B | 6T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 245M | 678B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 4.78B | 5.49T | 0% |
CGEAF | CVHSY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGEAF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVHSY (89). This means that CGEAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVHSY’s over the last 12 months.
CVHSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGEAF (100). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.
CVHSY's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGEAF (95). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.
CVHSY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CGEAF (55). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew similarly to CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.
CVHSY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGEAF (34). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGEAF’s over the last 12 months.
| CGEAF | CVHSY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 31% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 72% |
Advertisement
CGEAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGEAF and CGECF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGEAF and CGECF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGEAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGEAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CGECF - CGEAF | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
| CVHSY - CGEAF | 12% Poorly correlated | -10.89% | ||
| BGAOY - CGEAF | 6% Poorly correlated | -3.93% | ||
| BTGOF - CGEAF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.60% | ||
| BZQIF - CGEAF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CVHSY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CVHSY and IIJIF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVHSY and IIJIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVHSY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVHSY | 100% | -10.89% | ||
| IIJIF - CVHSY | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TEO - CVHSY | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
| BGAOY - CVHSY | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.93% | ||
| TV - CVHSY | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
| CGEAF - CVHSY | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||