Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGDG vs CZAR
CGDG vs CZAR Comparison
Open Charts CGDG vs CZAR
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Price$36.63
Change+$0.12 (+0.33%)
Volume$1.68K
Net Assets4.44B
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
Price$32.01
Change+$0.47 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6M
CGDG vs CZAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGDG vs. CZAR commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGDG is a Hold and CZAR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGDG has more net assets: 4.44B vs. CZAR (1.6M). CGDG has a higher annual dividend yield than CZAR: CGDG (2.441) vs CZAR (-1.765). CGDG was incepted earlier than CZAR: CGDG (2 years) vs CZAR (2 years). CZAR (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than CGDG (0.47). CZAR has a higher turnover CGDG (25.00) vs CGDG (25.00).
| CGDG | CZAR | CGDG / CZAR | |
| Gain YTD | 2.441 | -1.765 | -138% |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 1.6M | 278,209% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.35 | 134% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 84.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 1.91 | 1.46 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGDG | CZAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGDG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGDG has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGDG jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDG | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| BN - CGDG | 76% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| MS - CGDG | 67% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| KLAC - CGDG | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| BR - CGDG | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.25% | ||
| REXR - CGDG | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||
CZAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZAR has been loosely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZAR jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZAR | 100% | -1.71% | ||
| LIN - CZAR | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| V - CZAR | 50% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MA - CZAR | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| BLK - CZAR | 49% Loosely correlated | -4.43% | ||
| CRH - CZAR | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
More | ||||