Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs TRCLX
CGCYX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs TRCLX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$47.26
Change-$3.77 (-7.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
CGCYX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. CGCYX (49.9M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: CGCYX (1.92) vs TRCLX (1.49). CGCYX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: CGCYX (9 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (1.73) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.34). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. CGCYX (48.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: TRCLX (500000) vs CGCYX (1000000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. CGCYX (28.48). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. CGCYX (-43.67).
| CGCYX | TRCLX | CGCYX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.03 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.73 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.228 | 10.035 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 66.9M | 75% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.49 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.48 | 50.04 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.09 | 28.71 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.67 | -9.00 | 485% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |