Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs MCDFX
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$48.71
Change-$0.10 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. CGCYX (52.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: MCDFX (2.78) vs CGCYX (0.96). CGCYX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CGCYX (9 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. CGCYX (40.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: MCDFX (2500) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.21 vs. MCDFX (27.74). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. CGCYX (-35.79).
| CGCYX | MCDFX | CGCYX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.898 | 28.884 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.5M | 104M | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 2.78 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.21 | 27.74 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.40 | 36.75 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.79 | -3.89 | 919% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement