Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs MCDFX
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$47.00
Change+$0.51 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.51M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. CGCYX (50.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: MCDFX (2.83) vs CGCYX (1.04). CGCYX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CGCYX (9 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. CGCYX (48.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: MCDFX (2500) vs CGCYX (1000000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.35 vs. CGCYX (25.33). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.14 vs. CGCYX (-34.91).
| CGCYX | MCDFX | CGCYX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.268 | 28.538 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.5M | 97.7M | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 2.83 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.33 | 27.35 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.44 | 16.44 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.91 | -8.14 | 429% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement