Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs MCDFX
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$47.67
Change-$0.34 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.08
Change-$0.12 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. CGCYX (50.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: MCDFX (2.83) vs CGCYX (1.04). CGCYX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CGCYX (9 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. CGCYX (40.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: MCDFX (2500) vs CGCYX (1000000). MCDFX (33.67) and CGCYX (33.62) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.21 vs. CGCYX (-37.09).
| CGCYX | MCDFX | CGCYX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.005 | 31.737 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.8M | 97.7M | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 2.83 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.62 | 33.67 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.08 | 21.70 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.09 | -5.21 | 712% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement