Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs MCDFX
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs MCDFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$49.53
Change-$0.07 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.05M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
CGCYX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. CGCYX (53M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: MCDFX (2.84) vs CGCYX (1.01). CGCYX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: CGCYX (9 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. CGCYX (40.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: MCDFX (2500) vs CGCYX (1000000). MCDFX (35.91) and CGCYX (35.18) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. CGCYX (-35.95).
| CGCYX | MCDFX | CGCYX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.119 | 34.849 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53M | 99.3M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 2.84 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.18 | 35.91 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.30 | 36.33 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.95 | -2.29 | 1,567% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement