Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FIQFX
CGCYX vs FIQFX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FIQFX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$47.26
Change-$3.77 (-7.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$59.78
Change+$3.88 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
CGCYX vs FIQFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FIQFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FIQFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. CGCYX (49.9M). CGCYX (1.92) and FIQFX (1.87) have matching dividends . CGCYX was incepted earlier than FIQFX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FIQFX (7 years). CGCYX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FIQFX (34.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FIQFX (250) vs CGCYX (1000000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.17 vs. CGCYX (28.48). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.72 vs. CGCYX (-43.67).
| CGCYX | FIQFX | CGCYX / FIQFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.77 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.77 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.228 | 10.930 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 2.07B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.87 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.48 | 57.17 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.09 | 72.89 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.67 | 2.72 | -1,605% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |