Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKTX
CGCYX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKTX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$48.71
Change-$0.10 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$53.35
Change-$0.30 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
CGCYX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKTX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. CGCYX (52.5M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: CGCYX (0.96) vs FHKTX (0.78). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKTX (17 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKTX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.71 vs. CGCYX (31.21). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 7.33 vs. CGCYX (-35.79).
| CGCYX | FHKTX | CGCYX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.43 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.43 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.898 | 40.210 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.78 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.21 | 33.71 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.40 | 99.90 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.79 | 7.33 | -488% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement