Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKIX
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKIX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$48.71
Change-$0.10 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$54.32
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKIX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. CGCYX (52.5M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: FHKIX (1.02) vs CGCYX (0.96). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKIX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.42 vs. CGCYX (31.21). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.57 vs. CGCYX (-35.79).
| CGCYX | FHKIX | CGCYX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.90 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.90 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.898 | 40.798 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.02 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.21 | 34.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.40 | 103.20 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.79 | 10.57 | -339% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement