Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKCX
CGCYX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKCX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$47.67
Change-$0.34 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.22
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
CGCYX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. CGCYX (50.8M). CGCYX (1.04) and FHKCX (1.00) have matching dividends . CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). CGCYX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKCX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.03 vs. CGCYX (33.62). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.28 vs. CGCYX (-37.09).
| CGCYX | FHKCX | CGCYX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.91 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.005 | 39.702 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.8M | 1.74B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.00 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.62 | 39.03 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.08 | 70.29 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.09 | 1.28 | -2,903% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 120.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement