Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKCX
CGCYX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKCX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$47.26
Change-$3.77 (-7.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
Fidelity China Region
Price$60.43
Change+$4.08 (+7.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
CGCYX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. CGCYX (49.9M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: CGCYX (1.92) vs FHKCX (1.58). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). CGCYX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKCX (34.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKCX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.96 vs. CGCYX (28.48). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.14 vs. CGCYX (-43.67).
| CGCYX | FHKCX | CGCYX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.91 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.91 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.228 | 10.921 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 2.07B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.58 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.48 | 56.96 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.09 | 72.17 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.67 | 2.14 | -2,042% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 208.30 | - |