Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKAX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$49.53
Change-$0.07 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.05M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$54.99
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKAX commentary
Nov 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. CGCYX (53M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: CGCYX (1.01) vs FHKAX (0.85). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). CGCYX (1.24) and FHKAX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKAX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.37 vs. CGCYX (35.18). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.18 vs. CGCYX (-35.95).
| CGCYX | FHKAX | CGCYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.18 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.18 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.119 | 43.274 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53M | 1.81B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 0.85 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.18 | 40.37 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.30 | 91.79 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.95 | 5.18 | -694% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement