Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKAX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$47.26
Change-$3.77 (-7.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$59.52
Change+$4.06 (+7.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. CGCYX (49.9M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: CGCYX (1.92) vs FHKAX (1.44). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). CGCYX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKAX (250) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.55 vs. CGCYX (28.48). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.55 vs. CGCYX (-43.67).
| CGCYX | FHKAX | CGCYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.17 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.17 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.228 | 10.879 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 2.07B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.44 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.48 | 56.55 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.09 | 70.73 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.67 | 0.55 | -7,957% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 202.36 | - |