Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKAX
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKAX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$48.71
Change-$0.10 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.89
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
CGCYX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. CGCYX (52.5M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: CGCYX (0.96) vs FHKAX (0.86). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) and FHKAX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKAX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.06 vs. CGCYX (31.21). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.88 vs. CGCYX (-35.79).
| CGCYX | FHKAX | CGCYX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.18 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.18 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.898 | 40.485 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.86 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.21 | 34.06 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.40 | 101.45 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.79 | 8.88 | -403% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement