Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FCHKX
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FCHKX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$47.67
Change-$0.34 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$50.54
Change-$0.12 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FCHKX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FCHKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. CGCYX (50.8M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: CGCYX (1.04) vs FCHKX (0.46). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FCHKX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FCHKX (18 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FCHKX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.62 vs. CGCYX (33.62). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : -4.36 vs. CGCYX (-37.09).
| CGCYX | FCHKX | CGCYX / FCHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.93 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.005 | 38.388 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.8M | 1.74B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.46 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.62 | 37.62 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.08 | 65.21 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.09 | -4.36 | 850% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 104.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement