Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FCHKX
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FCHKX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$48.71
Change-$0.10 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$51.11
Change-$0.29 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FCHKX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FCHKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. CGCYX (52.5M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: CGCYX (0.96) vs FCHKX (0.45). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FCHKX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FCHKX (17 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FCHKX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.05 vs. CGCYX (31.21). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 4.50 vs. CGCYX (-35.79).
| CGCYX | FCHKX | CGCYX / FCHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.93 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.898 | 39.645 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.45 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.21 | 33.05 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.40 | 97.05 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.79 | 4.50 | -796% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.37 | - |