Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FCHKX
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FCHKX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$47.26
Change-$3.77 (-7.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$56.74
Change+$4.13 (+7.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FCHKX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FCHKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. CGCYX (49.9M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: CGCYX (1.92) vs FCHKX (0.79). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FCHKX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FCHKX (18 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.34). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FCHKX (250) vs CGCYX (1000000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.38 vs. CGCYX (28.48). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : -3.52 vs. CGCYX (-43.67).
| CGCYX | FCHKX | CGCYX / FCHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.92 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.92 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.228 | 10.820 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 2.07B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.79 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.48 | 55.38 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.09 | 67.02 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.67 | -3.52 | 1,240% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 185.07 | - |