Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FCHKX
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FCHKX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$49.53
Change-$0.07 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.05M
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$52.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
CGCYX vs FCHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FCHKX commentary
Nov 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and FCHKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. CGCYX (53M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: CGCYX (1.01) vs FCHKX (0.44). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FCHKX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FCHKX (18 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FCHKX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.34 vs. CGCYX (35.18). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 0.95 vs. CGCYX (-35.95).
| CGCYX | FCHKX | CGCYX / FCHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.93 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.119 | 42.350 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53M | 1.81B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 0.44 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.18 | 39.34 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.30 | 87.58 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.95 | 0.95 | -3,770% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement