Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs UPAR
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs UPAR
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$1.08M
Net Assets3.65B
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
Price$15.55
Change-$0.05 (-0.32%)
Volume$1.84K
Net Assets59.88M
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. UPAR commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and UPAR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.65B vs. UPAR (59.9M). UPAR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: UPAR (24.199) vs CGBL (12.724). CGBL was incepted earlier than UPAR: CGBL (2 years) vs UPAR (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than UPAR (0.65). CGBL has a higher turnover UPAR (12.00) vs UPAR (12.00).
| CGBL | UPAR | CGBL / UPAR | |
| Gain YTD | 12.724 | 24.199 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 59.9M | 6,095% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.65 | 51% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 12.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 1.96 | 3.88 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | UPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 9 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
More | ||||
UPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UPAR and WTRG have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPAR and WTRG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPAR | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| WTRG - UPAR | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| MP - UPAR | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.64% | ||
| SMG - UPAR | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.76% | ||
| AAL - UPAR | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
| WMS - UPAR | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||