Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs UPAR
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs UPAR
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.91
Change-$0.12 (-0.35%)
Volume$629.08K
Net Assets3.08B
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
Price$14.09
Change-$0.05 (-0.35%)
Volume$1.43K
Net Assets56.56M
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. UPAR commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and UPAR is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.08B vs. UPAR (56.6M). UPAR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: UPAR (11.564) vs CGBL (9.414). CGBL was incepted earlier than UPAR: CGBL (2 years) vs UPAR (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than UPAR (0.65). CGBL has a higher turnover UPAR (12.00) vs UPAR (12.00).
| CGBL | UPAR | CGBL / UPAR | |
| Gain YTD | 9.414 | 11.564 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 56.6M | 5,440% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.65 | 51% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 12.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 1.91 | 3.72 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | UPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||
UPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UPAR and VALE have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPAR and VALE's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPAR | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| VALE - UPAR | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| WDS - UPAR | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
| HES - UPAR | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RIO - UPAR | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| BHP - UPAR | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||