Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs UPAR
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs UPAR
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.63
Change-$0.41 (-1.17%)
Volume$984.19K
Net Assets3.87B
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
Price$15.51
Change-$0.14 (-0.89%)
Volume$1.81K
Net Assets60.25M
CGBL vs UPAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. UPAR commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and UPAR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.87B vs. UPAR (60.2M). UPAR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: UPAR (24.998) vs CGBL (13.665). CGBL was incepted earlier than UPAR: CGBL (2 years) vs UPAR (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than UPAR (0.65). CGBL has a higher turnover UPAR (12.00) vs UPAR (12.00).
| CGBL | UPAR | CGBL / UPAR | |
| Gain YTD | 13.665 | 24.998 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 3.87B | 60.2M | 6,422% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.65 | 51% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 12.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 1.95 | 3.78 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | UPAR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 51% | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
UPAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPAR has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPAR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPAR | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| SHEL - UPAR | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| WDS - UPAR | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| WTRG - UPAR | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| MP - UPAR | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.60% | ||
| SMG - UPAR | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||